Home arrow Forum
Latest posts of: Nydoc
August 28, 2008, 12:29:40 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Search Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14]
196  Achieving the Space Elevator / Science & Technology / Rotating tether on: December 05, 2005, 11:52:50 PM
Quote from: neil
A tip dips into the exosphere at 15 minute intervals, providing multiple attachment opportunities to most of the nations of Earth, daily.

The exosphere? Not even our shuttles fly that high, let alone most nations of Earth. If they can get that high they won't need a SE. Earth orbit is halfway to anywhere in the solar system.
197  Achieving the Space Elevator / Science & Technology / Do you mind dumb questions? on: December 02, 2005, 11:41:58 AM
Quote from: Bob Munck
The idea also depends on the ribbon material being sufficiently inexpensive, because we have to throw away a great deal of it to lift a usable ribbon into place.


The first ribbon would require enough material for two SEs. Subsequent SEs would have no material loss and could be deployed at full strength.
198  Achieving the Space Elevator / Science & Technology / Lunar SE- mobile anchor on: December 01, 2005, 02:48:44 PM
As far as a lunar slingshot is concerned, I don't see why it has to be on the pole. Sure it would require less energy to keep the rotation going, but it's speed would vary due to earth's gravity. If one was on the front side it could use earth's gravity to cancel droop. One on the backside could use "centrifugal" force to cancel droop.

I do have trouble visualizing it, though. If there are two opposing cables, would they be rotating in the same plane (disc shaped), or at an angle to each other (cone shaped)?

Is there a limit to the number of cables you could have on one hub?

Could payloads be accelerated with energy generated by the tether as it passes through the moon's magnetic field? Could the same be done for an earth sling shot, or would the cable just burn up?

Personally, I think building a lunar slingshot would violate some international law because of it's potential use as a weapon. That would be unfortunate, especially considering it's impracticallity compared to current weapons with much more controlled lethality.
199  Achieving the Space Elevator / Science & Technology / Weather, Lightning, Maintenance, other questions on: November 30, 2005, 12:26:13 PM
Quote from: neil
My guess is the electrical conductance of the ribbon will be less than 1/10 that of copper even if we sacrifice strength to get low resistance, so the tether is not usable to send large amounts of electricity for hundreds of kilometers. My guess is we should instead sacrifice some strength to get high resistivity. This will reduce vulnerability to lightning and other possible electric current flow such as EMP = electromagnetic pulse.   Neil


CNTs are probably the best conductors that can ever be possible on a nanoscale level at 0.4 milliohms. I think the Edwards report said that a 20 ton ribbon would be 5 megaohms, but I suspect the resistance will come from mostly from the non-CNT material and coating.  CNT power cables could theoretically withstand current densities of a gigaampere per square cm (an electrical cord the width of you finger could power an entire city). They also are extremely thermal conductive and are hoped to achieve higher levels of heat dissipation for microprocessors. This could be good news if you are worried about ice forming on the cable.

Some amount of discharge may occur in the radiation belts as one is positive and the other negative. Check out HiVOLT.

I would like to know if anyone has theories on how well the elevator would stand up against solar flares or positive lightning.
200  Achieving the Space Elevator / Science & Technology / Will the climbers cause the SE to fall toward Earth? on: November 30, 2005, 11:31:09 AM
Quote from: neil
Allowing large portions of the tether/ribbon to be slack may cause the entire tether to fall toward Earth.


Actually, I think slack would cause the counterweight to gain altitude and then slowly creep westward. All you would have to do is accelerate a tad.
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

Login Form

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 28, 2008, 12:29:40 AM
Username: Password:
Login with username, password and session length

Forgot your password?