My guess is the electrical conductance of the ribbon will be less than 1/10 that of copper even if we sacrifice strength to get low resistance, so the tether is not usable to send large amounts of electricity for hundreds of kilometers. My guess is we should instead sacrifice some strength to get high resistivity. This will reduce vulnerability to lightning and other possible electric current flow such as EMP = electromagnetic pulse. Neil
CNTs are probably the best conductors that can ever be possible on a nanoscale level at 0.4 milliohms. I think the Edwards report said that a 20 ton ribbon would be 5 megaohms, but I suspect the resistance will come from mostly from the non-CNT material and coating. CNT power cables could theoretically withstand current densities of a gigaampere per square cm (an electrical cord the width of you finger could power an entire city). They also are extremely thermal conductive and are hoped to achieve higher levels of heat dissipation for microprocessors. This could be good news if you are worried about ice forming on the cable.
Some amount of discharge may occur in the radiation belts as one is positive and the other negative. Check out
HiVOLT.
I would like to know if anyone has theories on how well the elevator would stand up against solar flares or positive lightning.