Aries I - problems
September 06, 2010, 02:32:24 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Aries I - problems  (Read 5573 times)
A_M_Swallow
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 839


View Profile
« on: October 27, 2006, 02:32:58 PM »

I am sorry to hear that the Aries 1 rocket is having problems.  This explains why the capsule size was reduced.  If they are having to make major reductions in the payload to get the rocket to fly it soon becomes the wrong rocket.  Using the return motors to gain initial LEO orbit is not how things are meant to work.
http://www.directlauncher.com/

If the problems are a significant as the report says dropping Aries I and replacing it by a much bigger rocket makes sense.  At 22 metric tons (mT) payload Aries I is less than the 23 mT Delta IV heavy, which has already flown and actually gets to LEO.

The case for replacing Aries I by 70 mT DIRECT (or Delta IV) is strong.
I am not convinced the larger 98 mT version of DIRECT is the correct replacement for the 130 mT Aries V.

Andrew Swallow
Logged

Andrew Swallow
A_M_Swallow
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 839


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2006, 11:28:08 AM »

NASA has completed its milestone review of the Ares 1 rocket.

http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2006/nov/HQ_06354_Constellation.html

"An example of the activity was a review and analysis that confirmed the planned Ares I launch system has sufficient thrust to put the Orion spacecraft in orbit. In fact, the Ares I thrust provides a 15 percent margin of performance in addition to the energy needed to put the fully crewed and supplied Orion into orbit for a lunar mission. Engineers established Orion's take off weight for lunar missions at over 61,000 pounds."
Logged

Andrew Swallow
publiusr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 364


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2007, 10:45:30 AM »

See here...
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5013
Logged
A_M_Swallow
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 839


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2007, 08:58:43 PM »

I suspect that there is a 90% probability that Ares I will be cancelled if the Falcon 9 (light) flies successfully next year, 2008.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falcon_9

The Falcon 9 Heavy version is due to fly in 2010 and can match the Ares I.  It will be cheaper and earlier.  The first cutback Congress applies will probably hit the Ares I.

Time to move the people and money from Ares I to developping the larger Ares V or Direct rocket.  This will also allow an earlier Moon mission.
Logged

Andrew Swallow
publiusr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 364


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 11, 2007, 11:18:30 AM »

New links...
Launch Vehicle Book
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/156347591X/encyclopediaastr

Alabama authors fight aliens! News at 11!
http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php?t=57860

Orion evolves again, modelers pull hair out!
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5097

Space Week continues tonite!
http://science.discovery.com/convergence/space-week/space-week.html
http://discovery.blogs.com/space_exploration_blog/2007/05/spaceflight_for.html#comments

Space Art
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/spaceart/art-f.html
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

Login Form

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 06, 2010, 02:32:24 AM
Username: Password:
Login with username, password and session length

Forgot your password?