So this is a pretty big project, not an easy feat for anyone to accomplish. Michael is the mad scientist, who knows everything about the project . He has dedicated his career to this thing and has a vast network of people who will help him build the LSEI. So, got it, Michael is important and makes active contribution to the project regularly. In actuality, Michael is everything that this project is.
​
So how are us interns helping? It’s a funny topic of conversation for my friends. Whenever my job gets brought up, someone asks the question of how I’m exactly helping. It’s not too common that a recent graduate is working on a space technology project, let alone something that they refer to as a “Moon Elevator.”

Well, Griffin and I are like Michael’s second and third right hands. There are so many tasks to accomplish and aspects of the company to work on that Michael has to prioritize his tasks very carefully. However, that is not to say that lower priority items don’t need to be happening immediately as well. Griffin and I pick up those lower priority items, that are critical to the development of the company but perhaps less pressing than other issues.

There is so much that goes into this project and this company that our priority list is constantly being shifted around as we react to developments and correspondence. On top of already being a tough job to explain to people, the things I’m actually working on change constantly as well. I initially started working on the website, then preparing a set of briefing documents for one of Michael's connections, and now, I’m writing some content that will be used in LiftPort’s upcoming book release. It never gets boring, that’s for sure. I’m just happy I can help with this project at all.

​-Jeremy Wain Hirschberg

What’s up LiftPort crew!

​I have realized that I have started my last 2 blog posts with the same opening words, so that was fun.   Anyways I will not be starting this blog the same, todays blog is about the importance of educating the public on space.   This post was inspired by a series of essays that I have been writing for LiftPort discussing community outreach and other stories that prove beneficial to tell about.
 
It has become increasingly more apparent to me while writing and researching that we, as a society, do not emphasize the importance of educating the public about space.  I wrote a blog post a couple of weeks ago about how hard it was to get people to take you seriously when you tell them you are working on a Moon Elevator; a large part of me is now convinced that people are reluctant to take it seriously because a Lunar Elevator is such a foreign concept to them.  The closest people have ever been to space is watching it on their TVs or computer screens.  The result of all of this is that we get a community that is un-engaged in the space world/industry.  This is at no fault of their own and I am not shaming anyone for being un-involved or unfamiliar in this industry.  Rather I am pointing out that we are not encouraging development and innovation in the ways that we should.  

I propose that we find a way to incorporate the history of, as well as the current state of space development into our school curriculum.  In so doing this, we as a society will be far more accepting of innovative ideas that have the potential to push humanity forward in new and exciting ways.  If people are exposed to space at a young age they will begin to normalize space in their minds, which will make innovating in this field standard and far easier.  
Above all else is the fact that society is making an unstoppable journey towards expanding the space industry.  Space is the next frontier for humanity and we have not been pursuing the technological research necessary to expand this field on the scale it deserves.  Space research is especially underfunded here in the US and if we wish to remain a world leader, we must begin exploring outside of this world.  It all begins with educating the public and normalizing the concepts of space, if we can manage this, space will prove lucrative and extremely beneficial to the human race. 

​Till next week!
Griffin 

The more I work at LiftPort, the more real the possibility that I take place in a revolutionary event for science and society becomes more and more actualized for myself.  It amazes me; I actually find myself laughing about it sometimes.  Me, a 22-year-old, recent graduate, could help put an Elevator on the Moon.  I’ve somewhat talked about the symbolic or more spiritual reasons why that would be significant for me (progressing science, space exploration, manifest destiny, etc.).  But, every once in a while, just for a second, consider the financial and professional benefits that I personally gain by being part of a project of that magnitude.  I would be famous.  I would be rich.  It would be unbelievable.  Our plan to establish LSEI is approximately 8 years.  I would be successful, more than successful, by the time I was 30 if this project actually happens.  It’s the dream.

Being young, rich and famous (and as a scientist no less) has its obvious perks.  Cars, houses, material objects that I have always wanted etc.  But there is something extremely valuable in being young and having money: investing.  Now, I’m not talking about hitting Wallstreet or getting a financial advisor to manage my money just to make more money.  I’m saying that if LSEI is built, I will be able to establish my own scientific think tank and fund all sorts of wild scientific endeavors.  That’s the real dream.  There are so many different things that I would love to research myself.  Too many things.  If I was accomplished and rich I could create research teams of my own.  Not only that, I would have access to developing the markets that LSEI makes possible out in space.  I love science, but research is tedious.  The dream is to be able to pay people to conduct research for you.

Okay so that’s best-case scenario.  What happens if it fails? Do I lose out big? Not really, no.  I am thoroughly impressed with Michael in that he has committed his life to this project and, if it fails, he takes all of the fallout.  That’s someone who believes in their dream and if anyone is going to make that dream happen, its him.  Me? If the project fails, I will have still made some money in working a summer job, will have excellent material to add to my resume and will have had the experience of not only building a startup from the ground up, but also working tirelessly to accomplish a dream and actualize science fiction of the future, into the reality of today.  Sounds like a win-win to me, count me in.  Let’s build a freakin Elevator on the Moon.  

-Jeremy Wain Hirschberg​

So what are we doing this summer?  What happens when the summer ends and my interns are done?  
Well, I won’t know the answer to the second question – until I’ve answered the first.  Griffin is still in school, locally, so he might be available if he wants to keep working – if it works around his academic program.  Conversely, this is Jeremy’s first job out of college.  He’s taking a gap-year before applying to graduate school.  I know I have them both until Labor Day.  After that, Griffin will go back to school, and Jeremy and I will chat about what his future looks like.

That means we’ve got a short window of opportunity to build something great!  They started in the middle of May, so today is basically the 1 month anniversary.  And now, after that preamble, I’m back to the question I started with – What are we doing?

For the first two weeks, all we did was plan.  They were sick of it, and I was sick of it.  I have this tool I created called the Noumenia Process which helps guide our decision-making.  I rolled it out for them, and for two weeks solid we worked through basic stuff like Vision, Mission and Values.  We prioritized what was important to our company, to our mission, and what was important to the near-term summer projects and to the long-term vision of the Lunar Elevator.  We built a lot of short- mid- and long-term Objectives.  Personally, I enjoyed brainstorming with them to develop the newest version of LiftPort Group.  But it’s a somewhat rigid process and we were excited to turn from the planning stage to actually doing productive work.

And here’s the thing about plans… they change.  We had done all this work prior to my attending the International Space Development Conference, when, while there, some interesting stuff happened – and plans changed.
​
We had a plan that involved building the TAC, and making a lot of phone calls this summer.  That is still happening.  But we have added a LOT of writing to the to do list.  We’ll share our writing with you, on the website.  Give us a couple days for that.
 
Take care,
Michael Laine,
​President, Lift Port Group

​

Whats up team?
As I continue to talk to people about LiftPort Group and what it means to construct LSEI (Lunar Space Elevator Infrastructure), it becomes increasingly more apparent to me that people are really sensitive about the moon.  I had never really thought about why until Michael gave me a new assignment that involved this same concept.  People are sensitive about the Moon because everyone retains their own personal and unique relationship with the Moon.  We can all recall at least one memory where the Moon was present, whether it was a walk on a beach or a late light in the cities.  People are protective of the Moon and statements like “we are going to mine the Moon” can often be problematic for them.  While the people's concerns are completely understandable, the logic behind it almost seems flawed. 

The fact of the matter is that the cost of living in the 21st century is steep, and destructive.  The very screen you are reading this post on was mined out of our earth.  Just for the screen you are looking at now a mountain may have been leveled, or a forest might have been destroyed just to get the rare earth elements to construct the components of your device.  Places like Colorado, Ontario, China, and parts of Africa are all being ravaged for rare earth elements, all so that we can continue to live in the 21st century.   If the world truly wants to stop strip-mining, then we need to give up our 21st century lifestyle and revert back to the 20th century standard of living.  Since that shift is extremely unlikely to take place, we have a choice to make.  We can either continue strip mining the Earth or, we need to find an alternative location, but the resources need to keep coming in to fill the stomach of the 21st century.

An alternative location to the Earth is the Moon. The Moon is an inert dead, biome absent, rock that is rich in ores and other rare earth elements that we can utilize instead of destroying our own earth.  We need to recognize that we have ventured too far down the rabbit hole to venture back to the 20th century lifestyle.  More importantly, we shouldn’t have to, we as a society have come far from our early beginnings, we have developed into an advanced world and the human race shouldn’t have to stop innovating because we run out of resources.  The resources are available outside of the Earth in large quantities, we just need to be daring enough to seize the opportunity.

See you all next week,
Griffin 

Two weeks ago, I was giving a lecture at the International Space Development Conference.  There was a full day of programming related to the Space Elevator, and I was the wrap-up speaker.  I gave my introductory talk on the Lunar Space Elevator Infrastructure.  I’ve been thinking about that talk, since then, because something was different that time.  I had a minor epiphany.

The audience was pretty typical.  There were about 50-60 people, from a variety of technical and non-technical backgrounds.  Notably there were several PhDs, but as is usual in a National Space Society public forum, the majority were non-technical space-hobbyists.  I particularly like this kind of audience for a couple reasons:

1. I’m a very capable generalist, but I’m not a specialist technician.  So if a question is deeply nuanced, I’m the wrong guy to answer it.    
2. These audiences rarely ask me something I can’t answer.  (I can usually parrot a response that my team has prepped me for.)  In this setting I can usually answer each question pretty well.
3. I genuinely like these fans; they are the lifeblood of a project like ours.  I like the hope and vision that they imagine our (humanity’s) near-term future will be like.

During the long Q & A period – in an hour talk, my ratio is usually 20 minutes of prepared lecture, and 40 minutes of responding to audience questions – I delivered my well-worn reply: “we don’t even have all the questions, yet, let alone have all the answers…”
And that line got me to thinking about the kinds of answers we are beginning to develop.  Because it is true, we are still developing the comprehensive list of questions, issues, and concerns which need to be addressed before we can build our Elevator on the Moon.  

We are also beginning to generate ‘answers’ to some of the issues we’ve identified.  But what kind of answers are they?
​
This project is a non-stop balancing act of trade-offs.  If we spend X amount of money we can buy Y number of rockets/string/robots, and achieve Z results.  Each Z result impacts and influences all the other variables and an ‘answer’ in one problem will inevitably impact all the other related problems.
In keeping with our Three Mandates (1. Single Launch Solution, 2. Current Technology, 3) Sputnik-like Simplicity) we are aiming for the simplest possible answer to the question – ‘how do we build an Elevator on the Moon?’  We don’t need feature-creep, or mission-creep.  We don’t need to add complexity to what is arguably the most complicated system every designed.  We don’t need the costs associated with add-on features.  We do need a system which will work; a system which will survive its infancy and grow over time.  And so, with ‘Sputnik-like Simplicity” in mind, I’m going with a new rule – Minimum Viable Answer.  This is the answer which will ‘work’.  It’s not the ‘best’, and it might not even be a ‘good’ answer.  It’s merely ‘good enough’.  That might mean that there are several preliminary answers which are ‘good enough’ – and which will plug into our models/simulations.  And maybe ‘good enough’ will evolve into ‘good’ as we refine things.  It is unlikely that we will ever get to a ‘best’ answer, because of the complexity of the trade-space.  
So thanks, Silicon Valley.  While I might loath your “minimum viable product” model, you did give me the language and the philosophy to develop this Occam’s Razor-esque tool for developing answers.

-Michael Laine,
​President, LiftPort Group